Search results

  1. J

    Which side of the global warming 'debate' cares more about facts and reality?

    The true-believers who listen to algore, and sights like wikipedia, or their personal political websites as proof? Or the skeptic's who believe that the scientific method should be used, and all non-corrupted (I.E. altered) non-manipulated data should be used and made completely transparent and...
  2. J

    Should physics be kept out of the anthropogenic global warming debate?

    When you look at AGW from a physics point of view, CO2 doesn't do what it is supposed too. What have the proponents of global warming figured out to counter physics in the AGW argument.
Back
Top