Search results

Well let's face it, if you had won, you would have been in the position of being smug and rubbing it in. Just accept the decision, ignore him, and move on.

Well let's face it, if you had won, you would have been in the position of being smug and rubbing it in. Just accept the decision, ignore him, and move on.

Well let's face it, if you had won, you would have been in the position of being smug and rubbing it in. Just accept the decision, ignore him, and move on.

"debates"? We all know Sky's "debate" will actually be nothing more than rehearsed soundbites. Why are Sky so obsessed with trying to railroad Gordon Brown into taking part in this farce? And why were the other two so quick to jump on this bandwagon? Are the manifestos and election addresses no...

I can't speak for the whole of Europe, only here in the UK. Broadcast media tends to be politically neutral, but there is open bias in printed media (generally in favour of the Tories). Television and radio is largely trusted and respected as unbiased. The BBC is often accused of bias, though...

It is normal and instinctive for toddlers to refuse fruits and vegetables. This may have some purpose, as it is thought this tendency reduces the likelihood of mistakenly eating poisonous plants. What constitutes "junk" is different for adults and children. Children are very active, burning...

I would need a specific example, I have never known a broadcast in the UK to give such vague information, particularly not the more renowned ones like BBC and ITN.

Army, land based military force RAF - obviously - the main airbourne fighting force Royal Marines - the "infantry" of the Navy (not the same as the US Marines)

She got a 5 year minimum. Whatever people think about the case, the fact is she will be released one day. Accept it.

The tie break is a recent innovation in tennis. Previously, before 1971, all sets played had to be won by 2 clear games, with the winner having won at least 6 games. When the tie break was introduced, it was decided the final set would not have a tie break.

You can only get into trouble if anything you say is libellous. Stick to facts. Don't think that using words like "allegedly" is enough to avoid being libellous.

To children, dangerous. EDIT - LiarLiar - I CAN think for myself thank you. And it is my opinion that no "innocent" man would pay someone like Jordan Chandler off to the tune of £18,000,000. Unless of course he was guilty as hell.

The titles roll, intoducing the news "read by (whoever)" And then someone completely different comes on screen telling you the previously named presenter is off. What's the point in that?

Channel 11 News?