Search results

What? if you can afford to hire a private lawyer, the court will not stop you. In fact, it's not even optional on your part. If you can afford your own representation, you are not entitled to a court appointed lawyer at all. No matter what, you can substitute your own choice of lawyer any...

Okay, if you need that, try Google. Ths site is for actual, specific questions, not a request for information on what i assume is a rather large body of information in order to do homework. In this world of the Internet, almost anything is available to you with a few taps of the keyboard. In...

...yeah, I have to agree with the person above me. One of those parties lost me way back there.

...yeah, I have to agree with the person above me. One of those parties lost me way back there.

If you signed an agreement not to sue (and why you did is beyond me), then it can be binding, yes. What makes an agreement valid is the signatures (and the specifics of the wording, or course, some contracts can't be valid ever). A witness or a notary only verify the signatures, so unless you...

?? First of all, you may be having trouble because you're reading your Geography text during History class (or maybe vice versa?) Or your teacher is.... These are clearly not History questions. 1) All 2)keys 3)demographic

I have no problem with cyclists using their legal right of way, even though common sense says NEVER assume! What does tick me off royally is the cyclist who ignore traffic laws. I pass a busy 3 way intersection every morning, and can't count the number of times I've seen cyclists barely slow...

Never, because it's physically impossible for all the planets to align. Nor will it in 2012, nor will they even come CLOSE in 2012, nor would any such alignment mean ANYTHING to the inhabitants of the earth. The other planets are so far away that their gravitational impact on earth is very...

Never, because it's physically impossible for all the planets to align. Nor will it in 2012, nor will they even come CLOSE in 2012, nor would any such alignment mean ANYTHING to the inhabitants of the earth. The other planets are so far away that their gravitational impact on earth is very...

Never, because it's physically impossible for all the planets to align. Nor will it in 2012, nor will they even come CLOSE in 2012, nor would any such alignment mean ANYTHING to the inhabitants of the earth. The other planets are so far away that their gravitational impact on earth is very...

Never, because it's physically impossible for all the planets to align. Nor will it in 2012, nor will they even come CLOSE in 2012, nor would any such alignment mean ANYTHING to the inhabitants of the earth. The other planets are so far away that their gravitational impact on earth is very...

Conventional cellular transmits radio a very short distance, to the nearest cel tower (usually less than a mile away) Satellite radio transmits radio 21,000 miles out to geosynchronous orbit. It's way easier to do one than the other. Cheaper too.

If you are making a constitutional defense, the case will work it's way up the court system, it does not go directly to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court only hears a tiny percentage of cases every year, and only those it views as having national importance.

If you are making a constitutional defense, the case will work it's way up the court system, it does not go directly to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court only hears a tiny percentage of cases every year, and only those it views as having national importance.

With this new advertising campaign for the movie 2012, and the movie itself out soon, I'm thinking this section is toast as far as any discussion of actual science. Does anyone see any hope that this section will not be totally overrun? I'm thinking I'll just go elsewhere for a few months...

The lawyer's office has bought the loan, so yes, they now have the right to repossess it. You can keep hiding, but they will find you, and they Will take back the car.

You can serve the address shown on your statement. Good luck with that.

Yes, they can sue you for the cost of lost rent plus any expenses incurred to re-lease. Their agreement had to be in writing, BEFORE you vacated the house.

If they have clear evidence, and it was an unprovoked attack, they can lay charges, or impose administrative penalties (solitary, or revocation of privileges). Otherwise, you're free to beat the crap out of each other.

If you are still on probation, it's because that is your sentence. The judge is unlikely to reduce it, especially when it was increased due to a violation. If you filed such a motion with the court and were turned down, writing the judge is not going to change it.