Say some trek teams comprise of less then ten trekkers. Some around 25, and some have 60 odd people thrown together.
I personally feel restricted physically and unable to enjoy if group has more then 25 participants. For me smaller the batter. What do you think?
Say some trek teams comprise of less then ten trekkers. Some around 25, and some have 60 odd people thrown together.
I personally feel restricted physically and unable to enjoy if group has more then 25 participants. For me smaller the batter. What do you think?
Say some trek teams comprise of less then ten trekkers. Some around 25, and some have 60 odd people thrown together.
I personally feel restricted physically and unable to enjoy if group has more then 25 participants. For me smaller the batter. What do you think?
Say some trek teams comprise of less then ten trekkers. Some around 25, and some have 60 odd people thrown together.
I personally feel restricted physically and unable to enjoy if group has more then 25 participants. For me smaller the batter. What do you think?
Some literary experts disqualify some spiritual gurus as 'writers' for they improvise. Such extempore discourses later published in book form and go on to become bestsellers. What is the logic behind such discrimination ?
By their logic if someone gets his manuscript typed by a typist, instead...