Search results

have any original aspects...? that were not borrowed and crow-barred from other religions of the times?

Bang, abiogenesis...? and basic physics with things like scripture, backwards rhetoric, anti-logic, ad-hominems, arguments from ignorance, appeal to authorities, anecdotes, logically circular questions and faulty sources, instead of actually presenting the scientific, credible evidence for your god?

...times, have any original aspects...? that were not borrowed and crow-barred from other religions of the times?

ask for evidence of god...? They have none to offer? Certainly, they don't think that even if they did actually scientifically falsify evolution, that they would get out of the duty of evidence for their own claim scott-free, do they?

How do we know to count on the majority, in any election, for anything relating to the country's well-being?

I mean, for what it's worth, if you think you can disprove evolution, big bang, or anything scientific for that matter, go and present this startling "evidence" at a national science conference or in a peer-reviewed, published article. How come none of you have done this? People - You obviously...

Part of me does because it reminds me of when I first really started learning about the truth of skeptical inquiry and science. The other part of me doesn't laugh because what they are doing is the same kind of thing many of us did before our inevitable deconversion and return to a sane...

Childhood terminal illnesses = "cti" The Epicurean Problem, Applied: Is god willing to do away with cti, but unable? Then he is not omnipotent. Is god able to do away with cti, but unwilling? Then he is malevolent. Is god both able and willing to rid cti? Then from whence cometh cti? Is god...