Recent content by Samurai Blur

A pro to teaching what you are claiming as "poetry" from it would be to help kids understand how to read works like Chauser and Shakespeare ( if you used KJV). The con would be with science. Kids would grow up thinking nonsense like "rabbits chew the cud" (Leviticus). Ultimately, there is no...

A pro to teaching what you are claiming as "poetry" from it would be to help kids understand how to read works like Chauser and Shakespeare ( if you used KJV). The con would be with science. Kids would grow up thinking nonsense like "rabbits chew the cud" (Leviticus). Ultimately, there is no...

A pro to teaching what you are claiming as "poetry" from it would be to help kids understand how to read works like Chauser and Shakespeare ( if you used KJV). The con would be with science. Kids would grow up thinking nonsense like "rabbits chew the cud" (Leviticus). Ultimately, there is no...

A pro to teaching what you are claiming as "poetry" from it would be to help kids understand how to read works like Chauser and Shakespeare ( if you used KJV). The con would be with science. Kids would grow up thinking nonsense like "rabbits chew the cud" (Leviticus). Ultimately, there is no...

A pro to teaching what you are claiming as "poetry" from it would be to help kids understand how to read works like Chauser and Shakespeare ( if you used KJV). The con would be with science. Kids would grow up thinking nonsense like "rabbits chew the cud" (Leviticus). Ultimately, there is no...