Under the Bush administration, would the US government have needed evidence before declaring a person an "enemy combatant" or could they just say that any random person was an enemy combatant.
Could you also please provide sources
In the Supreme Court's ruling "Ex parte Quirin" they stated that unlawful combatants are not entitled to the rights of the Geneva Convention. Does this mean that the unlawful combatant is merely subject to trial and punishment by military tribunals or does it mean that the unlawful combatant is...
Under the Bush administration, would the US government have needed evidence before declaring a person an "enemy combatant" or could they just say that any random person was an enemy combatant.
Could you also please provide sources